#Kubernetes

A Reference Architecture for a Sovereign Government Cloud

The two previous articles showed where Togolese law and Kubernetes fail to meet, then why multi-cloud does not answer a jurisdictional question. This one proposes what to build: a reference architecture for a sovereign government cloud in the WAEMU context. Requirements derived from the legal texts, layer-by-layer design choices with their justifications, an operating model, stated limits, and an honest comparison with the alternatives. An architecture document, not a tutorial.

The Multi-Cloud Illusion for the State: Duplication Is Not Sovereignty

Multi-cloud is sold to African countries as the answer to both resilience and digital sovereignty: spread workloads across several hyperscalers and you dilute risk and vendor power. Under Togo's Law 2019-014 on personal data and the ANCY cybersecurity regime, that promise does not hold. This article argues that multi-cloud does not divide legal exposure, it multiplies it, and closes with a decision framework for when it is legitimate and when it is not.

Decree 2018-062 and Kubernetes: The Gap Between the Text and the Implementation

Decree 2018-062, which implements Togo's law 2017-007 on electronic transactions, imposes obligations on security, traceability, retention and continuity. But those obligations were written with a physical server or VM in mind. Kubernetes introduces ephemeral pods, dynamic scheduling, volumes provisioned on the fly, and Operators. This article maps each obligation to its native Kubernetes equivalent, exposes the real gaps where the tool does not answer the text, and proposes implementation patterns. A legal-technical angle, not a tutorial.