#Sovereignty

Every Prompt Is a Cross-Border Transfer: AI Governance Under Law 2019-014

A company in Lomé or Dakar wires two hundred employees to American inference APIs, and nobody files anything. This article argues that a prompt containing customer data is a transfer of personal data to a third country in the sense of Togo's law 2019-014, that an LLM gateway does not change the legal nature of that transfer but is what makes it declarable, and that the residency options available to a West African company rank very differently on paper than they do once GPU prices, currency exposure and payment friction are counted.

A Reference Architecture for a Sovereign Government Cloud

The two previous articles showed where Togolese law and Kubernetes fail to meet, then why multi-cloud does not answer a jurisdictional question. This one proposes what to build: a reference architecture for a sovereign government cloud in the WAEMU context. Requirements derived from the legal texts, layer-by-layer design choices with their justifications, an operating model, stated limits, and an honest comparison with the alternatives. An architecture document, not a tutorial.

The Multi-Cloud Illusion for the State: Duplication Is Not Sovereignty

Multi-cloud is sold to African countries as the answer to both resilience and digital sovereignty: spread workloads across several hyperscalers and you dilute risk and vendor power. Under Togo's Law 2019-014 on personal data and the ANCY cybersecurity regime, that promise does not hold. This article argues that multi-cloud does not divide legal exposure, it multiplies it, and closes with a decision framework for when it is legitimate and when it is not.